DEBTOR NATION

VIDEOS

Wolf Richter On The Keiser Report
"Debtonomics and the NSA"

Wolf Richter on the Keiser Report
"Where Is The Fear"

Wolf Richter on Max Keiser's "On The Edge" 
"The Pauperization of America"

Wolf Richter on the Keiser Report
"Where the Money Goes to Die"

Clarke and Dawe: European Debt Crisis
Two favorite Australian Comedians

Clarke and Dawe: Quantitative Easing
Big industrial-strength printers, all facing the window

The Fastest Drive Ever Through San Francisco
Don't try to do this yourself
 

humanERROR - by "Frying Dutchman"
Powerful, lyrical appeal to the Japanese. Slams nuke industry, MSM, bureaucrats, and politicians.

« The Price Of “Collective Trauma”: Greece At The Brink of Civil War | Main | Germany’s Favorite Rabble-Rouser Economist Lashes Out »
Friday
Dec142012

The Beef Industry’s Deadly Secret: “Blading” and “Needling” 

I love steaks. Rare. So I’m biased. But now there is the report of a year-long investigation by The Kansas City Star into the industry practice of mechanical tenderization. Meat packers take certain cuts and run them through a mechanical tenderizer where dozens of needles or double-edged blades perforate them. The result is a “bladed” or “needled” steak. It’s tenderer, and perceived to be of higher quality, so it can be sold for a higher price. And more profit. The perfect alignment of American values. The process can do something else, however: push potentially deadly E. coli into the core of the steak.

It’s been going on for decades. By 2008, according to a USDA survey, over 90% of the beef producers were blading or needling certain cuts. But nothing on the label said so. Turns out, steak lovers have been deluding themselves into assuming that any E. coli bacteria would remain on the surface and would be killed by the heat.

The US beef industry is a powerful lobby. Packers employ 260,000 people who handle 26 billion pounds of beef a year. After a bout of Wall-Street engineering, beef packers have coagulated into essentially four companies: JBS USA, owned by JBS of Brazil, the largest beef packer in the world; Tyson Foods; Cargill; and National Beef of Kansas City. Together they slaughter 87% of all heifers and steers.

This concentration has allowed the industry to become more efficient, presumably putting downward pressure on prices, though you might not have noticed while under sticker shock at the grocery store.

Though the incidence of E. coli illnesses has declined over the years as industry standards have improved (we hope), they still occur at an alarming rate. The Star writes:

Just this fall, an estimated 2.5 million pounds of E. coli-contaminated meat, including mechanically tenderized cuts, quietly crossed the Canadian border into the United States before it was caught by inspectors.

It triggered a massive recall in Canada, where 17 people fell sick, five of whom had eaten mechanically tenderized steaks. But in the US, the beef wasn’t recalled. Instead, the FDA issued a “Public Health Alert,” and the beef ended up on the shelves.

Mechanically tenderized steaks are two to four times riskier than regular steaks, according to a study cited by The Star. Risks that have been known “for quite some time,” said Carlota Medus, principal epidemiologist at Minnesota’s health department. Mechanically tenderized steaks have been identified “as a vehicle for outbreaks since 2003,” she said. “It’s not as risky as ground beef, but it is definitely riskier than an intact steak.”

After the article appeared in The Star, US Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, a Democrat from New York and member of the Agriculture Committee, sent a letter to the Office of Management and Budget, which is currently pouring over a new labeling rule that the USDA wants to implement.

The USDA has been on this case for years and has pressured the industry to label “bladed” or “needled” beef voluntarily, but few packers complied. Costco is among the stores that labels their beef appropriately, along with a warning: “for your safety USDA recommends cooking to a minimum temperature of 160 degrees.”

Sen. Gillibrand wrote that consumers were “largely unaware” of this risk and did not “routinely cook beef cuts such as steaks well enough to eliminate such pathogens.” She asked that the agency make “every effort to expedite the release of this proposed labeling rule in order to inform consumers about potential and serious risks of food-borne illness.”

Steak lovers should know if the meat has been mechanically tenderized. It would allow them to make a logical decision: eat steak overcooked and be safe, or knowingly take the risk of eating something delicious that might be deadly. A basic risk-reward calculation. We make those decisions routinely. Yet, worried that the truth would lead to confusion and reluctance, hence a drop in sales, the industry fiercely resists labeling. It has done so with hormones and antibiotics as well. Under the motto that it’s always better to keep consumers in the dark.

As a kid in Germany, I engaged in underage beer drinking. I was too young to drive, so it didn’t bother anyone—except me, the next day. At the time, German beer consumption peaked at 151 liters per capita, the highest in the world. But then I went to America ... and German beer consumption plunged. Alas, in the US and other Western countries, the beer industry is now morose as well. But it’s booming elsewhere. Read.... Beer, A Reflection Of The World Economy?

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (12)

Chicken is even (and much) worse. In the US probably 100s of people die annually of that (most in a pretty bad condition already it has to be said) also mainly because safe chicken would be substantially more expensive. If someone dies in a once in a decade incident all sorts of measures are required, but this like the needled stakes can go on for decades.

Probably government has an interest in it as well. These are items that really point the finger at inflation which is tried to kept low. By keeping prices low if possible by using another benchmark or by other means if not. Didnot LBJ did something with eggs in his time?

Overhere we are of the opinion that underage drinking and not having a license yet is the ideal combination as they cannot suspend your license. Again just from which angle you look at things.
December 14, 2012 | Unregistered CommenterRik
RIk - Agreed, chicken is much, much worse. But everybody knows it. So we handle it with care. We wash our hands and clean utensils carefully after handling raw chicken, and we cook chicken to death. But a well-done steak to me just isn't edible. In my case, I might have to abandon eating steak (I already eat a lot less than I used to). And that is what the industry is afraid of: lower sales. It's a powerful lobby, and I doubt that labeling rules will make it through the process.
December 15, 2012 | Registered CommenterWolf Richter
What kills sales is that a steak dinner that cost $17 a year ago is now $24. I'm eating about six steaks a year. I'll eat even less when the same dinner is $24,000 in a year or so.
December 15, 2012 | Unregistered CommenterJohn S
I regularly eat raw steak, ground to hamburger beef. I prefer a simplified steak tartar with just chopped herbs, salt and pepper.

That is, I regularly eat steak tartar in Finland and never in California. While in California I eat a lot of sushi, which is consistently fresh and tasty. But back in Finland I inspect suspiciously the fresh fish on offer.

I've often thought that as a Finnish customer I would be willing to pay double for a fish that still swims in a tank when I purchase it, if the fishmonger would clean it in the store under my watch.

I have suggested the fish tank idea to a couple of Finnish fish mongers and the response is always an incongruous laughter. No-o! No-o, even when it is quite usual that the fish on a fish counter has died 5 days before the customer has an opportunity to buy it. No-o, even if the fish is farmed and has spent its whole life in a tank. Oh, no.

Several years ago a wet market fisher got sued for selling small Baltic herrings that still kicked in the sales bin. The Finnish regulation degrees that after fish is lifted from the water the fish should be killed immediately and without any undue pain to the fish. So all the little herrings, fished using a drag net, should have all been mercifully killed long before they reached the local wet market. Instead, the fisher had probably dumped the herrings from the net directly into the bins lined with crushed ice and hurried to the wet market.

The court case got news coverage in the humor section. The fisher testified that he thought he had killed each fish but obviously had accidentally overlooked some. No penalty was issued. After the incident the regulation has not been eagerly enforced. But fish on the fresh fish counter remain not-that-fresh and nobody seems willing to test the officials' interpretation of the regulation concerning fish tanks, nor the public sentiment towards choosing the dinner among live fish from the tank.

To paraphrase Tolstoy, each market is unhappily regulated in its own, particular way.
December 15, 2012 | Unregistered Commentercool river
I've never heard of this practice. Amazing. To be honest, your story this is how it is to be done. The only law that should be past is forcing companies into transparency on these issues so we can make informed choices.
December 15, 2012 | Unregistered Commenterjohnnygeneric
@Wolf
The problem is as far as I can see it twofold:
if the production is mass the tenderising equipment like with meat loaf or burgers 'touches' all pieces. Plus it not only touches the outside but also the inside of the piece of meat. The mass productionprocess takes care that if one piece/cow has a problem it is spread over all stuff. Grinding or needling takes care that the pathogenes end up in the centre of the burger, steak or whatever.
As far as I can see it it is mainly the lower qualities, tougher steaks they do it with. Simply avoid those Japanese like in cool river's example also use the best parts for sushi. That is with a reason and the reason is not only taste.

Another one if you get more industrial processed foods they simply like to use all sorts of basically unnatural methods mainly to make a profit. Hormones and anti-biotics (porcessing left overs to use them another) for instance. Hormones allthough not in favour personally providing it are small dosis and the same stuff the animal has naturally and last injected a decent period before slaughter looks sot of ok. Only the taste suffers and I donot like the idea and there is always a chance that something goes wrong. But long term effects of anti-biotics look pretty dodgy to me. We simply donot know enough and there are clear indications that some bacteria get imune from it.
Looks like Europe has that better under control than the US. Especially Germany most butchers show the farms where the animals come from, small scale slaughter.

Few foods are better than a good steak, they should not spoil that pleasure. A good steak is one of the basic human rights as far as I am concerned. And overcooked is as you say unedible and anyway we are civilised people no Texans.
December 15, 2012 | Unregistered CommenterRik
Wolf, do you know if there are any tell-tale signs of the process? When I buy cubed steak it's obvious the thing has been mechanically tenderized.

The USDA recently lowered the min internal temperature of pork to 145F. I couldn't believe how pink it sill was. I'm sticking with 160F.
December 16, 2012 | Unregistered Commenterjohnnygeneric
Johnnygeneric - my understanding is that even chefs can't tell the difference if the meet is frozen. If the meat is fresh, you should be able to see it, if you look closely. But at the store, you aren't allowed to unpack the meat and inspect it.

Rik - I love your line: "A good steak is one of the basic human rights"

Cool river - I live in a half-Japanese household, and we eat fish just about every day, in all its forms, dead or alive, and we love it. It took me a few years, but now my wife finally loves steak as well, so I hope she didn't read my article.
December 16, 2012 | Registered CommenterWolf Richter
well ALL seafood is tainted, except maybe from the atlantic......Japan is still pouring millions of tons of cooling wastewater on the still hot reactors (too much to store in ponds) since the cooling units are out they have to spray seawater on them...
SO....North/Mid Pacific: radiation and mercury Gulf of Mexico, broken down oil and TONS or COREXIT-and perhaps Mercury....eventually all these waters will mix and all be fouled to some degree
December 17, 2012 | Unregistered CommenterKLM
It's not just cheap cuts of beef, it's high end ones as well. Even "prime rib" roasts which are at the upper end of the spectrum come with stickers from Costco saying they're mechanically tenderized. This means that the rest of the retailers are simply hiding this fact and not labeling it.
December 18, 2012 | Unregistered CommenterEddy
I've raised my own grass fed/finished beef for 10 years. It is delicious and it is tender. The few commercial steaks that I have had during those years may beat mine for "cut with your fork" tenderness, but taste quite bland. Find a real steak, visit a farmers market, pay what real food costs to produce, and learn how to cook it. You'll be fine.
December 21, 2012 | Unregistered Commentersamhell
I am much more concerned about the raw fruits and vegetable we eat. They are pooped on every day by birds and animals and cause much, much, more food poisonings than does beef.
December 26, 2012 | Unregistered CommenterMKOHOUT

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.